In the past rural and remote communities ran the local hospital with a community board, and social care services such as disability support, aged care and welfare were provided by NGOs established and operated by local people. Over the last decade many of these functions have been assumed by governments. Local rural hospitals were taken over by larger regional networks, and local community boards replaced. In the social services sector, small charities that provided local services using local people closed and were replaced with services run out of large corporate charities in metropolitan and regional cities. The effect of these changes was the loss of local community control over health and social care in rural and remote communities, and a decline in access to services and health outcomes. Over the last several years, there has been growing number of research papers that demonstrate that this loss of community knowledge, engagement and commitment has been a major contributor to the failure of rural health and social care services in Australia to meet community needs. Genuine community control was replaced with "superficial engagement" where the "community is denied access to the decision-making process, and interactions tend toward tokenism and marginalisation, or the community is simply informed of plans or consulted to provide limited perspectives on select activities". This article explore the concept of meaningful community engagement, and how governments can work collaboratively with communities and residents again ("through those who share similar situations, concerns, or challenges").